top of page
Gradient.jpg
Arrow 2.png
cocs circle (1).png

The Commons
Borrowery

Conceptual end-to-end app design for a community-focused storefront that empowers people to live sustainably by borrowing instead of buying.

“Join us in our mission to create a more sustainable future, one borrowed item at a time.”  

Role

Graphic Designer

UX Designer

UX Researcher 
 

Tools Used

Figma

Otter.ai

Survey Planet

Optimal Workshop

Maze

 

Timeline

5 weeks

 

Solution

Our solution to the problem of accessing items and tools that people only need occasionally or temporarily is a unique borrowing platform that emphasizes community, sustainability, and convenience. Our branding and app design reflect these values with a bright and friendly color scheme, clear and user-friendly interface, and intuitive functionality.  Through our innovative approach, we aim to make borrowing and sharing as easy and accessible as possible, while also promoting environmental sustainability .

Problem

People often face challenges when trying to access items and tools they only need occasionally or temporarily. Buying these items outright is expensive and wasteful, and borrowing from friends and neighbors can be awkward or unreliable. There is a need for a simple, affordable, and sustainable solution that makes it easy for people to access the items they need, without financial burden or waste of ownership, that also fosters a sense of community and collaboration and supports eco-friendly values.

What steps were taken to solve this problem?

By using the design process, we were able to truly understand our users and develop solutions that work for them. 

5d7e5a7b90431740cc08730d [Converted]-01.png

empathize

Arrow 2.png
5d7e5a7b90431740cc08730d [Converted]-02.png

define

Arrow 2.png
5d7e5a7b90431740cc08730d [Converted]-03.png

ideate

Arrow 2.png
5d7e5a7b90431740cc08730d [Converted]-04.png

prototype

Arrow 2.png
5d7e5a7b90431740cc08730d [Converted]-05.png

test

01. empathize

Research Goal

Develop a deeper understanding users perspectives on the shared economy model and the challenges and opportunities associated with building a borrowing platform that promotes sustainability and community engagement

Research Objectives

Identify Needs

Understand the needs of users who are seeking an effective borrowing system. What would encourage/ make users feel safe while more borrowing?

Catalog Experiences

Uncover the successes and frustrations users have faced while borrowing items in the past.

Analyze Competitors 

Gain inspiration from other e-commerce and sustainability - focused app designs.

 

Competitive Analysis

In order to gain valuable insights and stay ahead of the competition, we conducted a thorough competitive analysis of other e-commerce, borrowing, and community-focused apps. This allowed us to identify what was working and not working in their application strategies, providing valuable information to enhance the concept behind The Commons.

00000001.png

Summary of findings: 

• There does not seem to be any (functioning) community -based borrowing apps on the market.

 

• The popularity of Next door and Facebook come with a hefty dose of nasty commentary. We could avoid this by eliminating the social feed feature?

 

• All analyzed platforms are free for users! 

 

• None of these apps had UI that we were impressed with.

User Interviews

Time to get some user insight!
In order to better understand the needs of our users..

12 participants between the ages of 24-36 were either interviewed or surveyed.

(10 survey takers, 2 interviews)

Other important deets:

* both the survey and the interview asked the same questions. the interview was     done verbally and the survey was in essay question format on Survey Planet

* all participants identified as users wanted to use technology to live a more sustainable lifestyle

Gradient.jpg

Affinity Mapping

After conducting the interview and sifting thought the data, an affinity map was created to identify the patterns among the users.  We organized the data in various ways, but a few topics were most insightful.

Waste is on the minds of many

Users are open to sharing

There is a need for this service

click this to expand and browse! 

 Want to see how my brain organized the data? Check this out.

!!!

!!!

Key Takeaways

an "ah-hah!" moment:

The conversations we had with our participants were incredibly insightful. The concept of trust the users were expressing were the most telling. While all interviewees and survey takers expressed some interest in borrowing, there was a major commonality: 

​

**Users want to borrow rather than buy, but the community trust/buy in is just not there**

Interviewee #1

"I would share if I trusted them and knew I'd get it back in the same condition."

User Personas

After listening to the participants and using this newfound information, we developed a user persona based on insights gathered during our research. 

Group 3.png

Our DIY-Guy, Dan, became the main persona the project was intended for.  

​

Hi Dan! 

Gradient.jpg

02. define

POV & HMWs

Point of View Statement- Frames the problem in a way that keeps a focus on users, their needs, and the insights about them.

We'd like to discover ways for community members to borrow items in a way that feels authentic and trustworthy in order to make our planet a more enjoyable & sustainable place to be.

How Might We Questions- Turns the problem at hand into design opportunities.

(1) How might we incentivize community members to borrow rather than buy?

​

(2) How might we make users who want to borrow feel confident about finding items they need on the app?

Feature Set

In order to prioritize features in this end-to-end application, we outlined "must haves", "nice to haves", "surprising and delightful", and "can come later" features. This became our roadmap for the app.

Screen Shot 2023-05-30 at 9.34.14 PM.png

Project Goals

To further define the product, we brainstormed business, user, and tech goals within the context of the research findings.

Group 2.png

03. ideate

"Everyone has great ideas, but great ideators write them down."
 
Anonymous

Site Map

Using the information gathered from our users, the inspiration from our user personas, and the opportunity spaces that were found by my HMWs and project goals, we developed The Commons site map for the app.  

The Commons Site Map.png

Task Flows

After the site map was solicited, task flows were created for the app's three main features.

The Commons Task Flows.png

Wireframes

Defining our task flows helped us to create the initial iterations of low, mid-fid, and high fidelity screens. 

landing.png
profile.png
item_detail.png
barcode.png

Brand Board & UI Components 

Before creating The Commons' high-fidelity designs, we developed their brand board and UI Component Library in order to simplify the design process and create consistency across the platform. 

Commons Brand Board.png
Group 101.png

04. prototype

Prototypes

Flow 1 of the high fidelity design allows users to sign up for The Commons using their email address, and navigate through the tutorial pages to the landing page.

The second flow encourages users to change their pickup location, choose their preferred borrowing dates, and reserve their item. 
 

The third flow allows the user to navigate to their QR code to scan at the borrowery, scan the item they are 'returning', and return to the page where they would find another item to borrow.

05. test

Usability Testing

Time for testing! After finishing the high fidelity designs, we recruited 10 relevant participants to participate in usability tests; all tested virtually with Maze.

Testing Goals:
1. Evaluate usability of each flow.
2. Gather feedback on UI and user flow.
3. Identify common pain points.
4. Observe how users are feeling when navigating the product, noting how they feel about their overall experience.

Usability Test Findings

After our usability testing was complete, we organized the data to make sense of the findings for each task flow . 

click this to expand and browse! 

Task #1: Sign Up

maze_screenshot_interaction-8.jpg

90% Success

9/10 users successfully completed the task fully. 1 user did not complete the task because of a glitch with Maze.

The Expected 

All users clicked the 'sign up with email' button on navigation and navigated through the tutorial pages.

The Unexpected

30% users were confused by the 'swipe' directions in the tutorial pages. 

Task #2: Find & Reserve an Item

The Expected

All users were able to complete the task successfully.

The Unexpected

40% wanted to search for drill in a different way (either the search bar or by navigating to the tools category.

maze_screenshot_interaction-5.jpg

Task #3: Browse for more info; return to home page

The Expected

100% of users navigated to the barcode by either clicking the item to be returned, or by clicking the barcode icon in the navigation bar (both paths went to the same place)

Getting Home as Expected

The majority of testers navigated back to the homepage by clicking the "shop" icon in the navigation bar. 

Priority Revisions

After analyzing the results of our testing and sorting through the written feedback from the users, peers, and mentor, a few priority revisions were obviously needed. 

Iterations needed:

•  Build out a alternative search flow to find an item
•  Make swipe animation bigger/ less confusing
•  Increase smaller font sizes throughout, especially location text

Old Flow vs New Flow

before

reservation flow

click to expand and peruse all of the changes

A search-bar flow was added to the prototype in addition to being able to expand the drill from the recommended items.

after

iPhone 13.png

tutorial icon

before

The swipe annimation increased in size in order  to provide clearer direction to users during the tutorial screens.

after

Apple Set.png

So... What's Next?

1.  Retest updated wireframes using moderated usability testing

2.  Hand off to app developers

3.  Develop flows/wireframes for other features of The Commons app

Gradient.jpg

Reflection

 Over these 5 weeks, I learned A LOT.  The world of app design is it's own beast. I loved developing an app concept (and business) and taking that concept all the way through the design process. 



•  If I had more time, I would retest my iterations using a moderated test. While an unmoderated test helps in the realm of saving time, I feel like I lost valuable feedback without the ability to ask my users questions in real time. 



•  I love this process. App design is another UX niche that I really enjoyed! It was incredibly eye opening to design within the constraints (and flexibility!) of the app world.
 

Whew, thanks for listening!

questions? comments? constructive criticism? let me know

bottom of page